Cricket Team Colors

For a long time, cricketers only had white to wear: white trousers, white shirts, white shoes, white pads, and even white sweaters, for crying out loud. With the advent of one-day matches, this started to change. Now, you can recognize your favorite cricket team by what they wear, even if you don’t recognize the players.

Here are the colors for each team:

india1 India
They had a sky blue dress. The Board just changed it to darker shade of blue, still light, but not so much.
australia Australia
Yellow with some green markings. The Australian Baggy Green is a tradition in its own right.
south-africa South Africa   

Opposite of the Australia to some degree: Mainly green with some yellow stripes.

england England   

Regular Blue with Red

pakistan Pakistan   

Green everywhere. Dominated by the lighter green with the darker variety appearing to the sides

Sri Lanka India Cricket Muralitharan Sri Lanka   

A really dark blue. Not much else. 

west-indies-cricket West Indies   

Maroon red. Good thing they don’t wear those in Test matches.

new-zealand New Zealand   

Take one guess about what you expect from the Black Caps.

Bangladesh Bangladesh   

Dark green with red stripes.

 


[Images may be subject to copyright. Each image is linked to its respective source ]

England Team Keeps Fans Confused

antigua

England have bounced back from their spectacular low of 51 all out in the first Test against the West Indies with a monumental total of 566. With almost all the England players cashing in with 2 centuries and 3 fifties, this was a team effort and everyone deserves credit from being able to exorcise the ghosts of the Sabina Park debacle.

When a team makes a score ten times higher than their previous outing, we have to look closely at their patterns of performance. So, we took a look at the recent performances of England and compared it with the West Indies. To no one’s surprise, England is much stronger on its batting performances than the West Indies. The English team has an average of 36 runs per wicket in its last 13 Test matches (including the Jamaica Test), while the West Indies have an average of 31.68 per wicket. That is almost 43 runs per innings.

However, England’s scores have a standard deviation of 18 runs per innings, which means that they are as likely to score 180 as they are to score 540. WI have a standard deviation of 11 runs, which means their capability is more between 200 and 420. Obviously, teams change in composition (with players retiring or dropped) and they play against different countries, but it is still very striking. The West Indians, while performing poorly, are performing consistently. England, on the other hand, can put up huge scores, but are also prone to collective failures.

Even without the help of statistics, we see England running the gamut from an imperious 593/8 declared against an opponent no less than the South Africans, but also slumping to 110 all out against the Kiwis. The lowest score for West Indies was 139 and their highest score was 408, significantly lower than what England could achieve as a team. In fact, if they overhaul England’s first innings in the current Test, that would be a statistical outlier, almost 50% more than their high score in more than a year.

England should not have to bat again in this match, but the West Indians are pretty good at sticking around. And if the weather plays a part, they may still escape unscathed.

[Photo licensed from z_dead]

The Multiple Indian Squads for New Zealand

dravid

Here are the Indian squads for the New Zealand tour, by Tests, ODIs and T20′s:

                       Tests    ODIs     T20s
MS Dhoni                 Yes     Yes      Yes
Yuvraj Singh             Yes     Yes      Yes
Gautam Gambhir           Yes     Yes      Yes
Harbhajan Singh          Yes     Yes      Yes
Dinesh Karthik           Yes     Yes      Yes
Zaheer Khan              Yes     Yes      Yes
Munaf Patel              Yes     Yes      Yes
Virender Sehwag          Yes     Yes      Yes
Ishant Sharma            Yes     Yes      Yes
Sachin Tendulkar         Yes     Yes        -
L Balaji                 Yes       -        -
Rahul Dravid             Yes       -        -
Dhawal Kulkarni          Yes       -        -
VVS Laxman               Yes       -        -
Amit Mishra              Yes       -        -
M Vijay                  Yes       -        -
Praveen Kumar              -     Yes      Yes
Pragyan Ojha               -     Yes      Yes
Irfan Pathan               -     Yes      Yes
Yusuf Pathan               -     Yes      Yes
Suresh Raina               -     Yes      Yes
Rohit Sharma               -     Yes      Yes
Ravindra Jadeja            -       -      Yes

Nothing can state more clearly how cricket has changed than the composition of the squads. For a tour lasting just over a month, only 9 players out of 23 have been selected for all three forms of the game. Six of the Test players (including Dravid and Laxman) find themselves only in the Test team. At the other end of the spectrum, Ravindra Jadeja has been selected to play just the two T20′s, which combined make up less than a day of Test play.

Dhoni is the captain for all the three formats, and perhaps will be the wicketkeeper too for the most part. It is a miracle that he does not fall apart under the pressures of the captaincy and the wicketkeeper jobs. Other teams have experimented with different captains in different formats, but it has not caught on as much as it should have.

In general, this is a good trend. It provides more opportunities for youngsters to prove themselves as well as provide the right role for players. For example, some players may only excel in the limited overs format and they may have to kept there for ever. Sachin Tendulkar, for one, has recognized this, at least in the T20 arena.

[Photo licensed from vighi]

The Wicketkeeper

Philadelphian cricket team wicket keeper Henry Scattergood

Being the wicketkeeper is the hardest job in the cricket team. Every other player is judged on what they did, such as the number of runs scored or the wickets taken. But the wicketkeeper is judged on what they didn’t do. If they fail to take a catch or miss a stumping, that will be the defining moment of their match. Everybody expects the wicketkeeper to take catches, and they don’t forget the ones he missed. The extras column in a scorecard silently records the miscues of the wicketkeeper through byes and leg-byes.

The wicketkeeper is also forced to wear heavy protection throughout the innings – pads, gloves and helmet. They sometimes have to field leg-byes running in the heavy accessories. When the weather is warm, this can be very tiring. Wicketkeepers seldom get substitutes, unless they are injured, because of the inconvenience in decking someone up for the role.

In street cricket, players frequently want to keep wickets because they think it is less work than fielding. But in fact, wicketkeeping is the most tiring task of all the fielders. Because of the nature of the game (fewer fielders with no long stop, amateurish keeping), the wicketkeeper has to keep chasing a lot more balls than they initially planned to.

The wicketkeeper cannot relax at any time. They have to keep watching every ball from its delivey by the bowler to when it becomes dead. For example, the batsmen may take a run, and the wicketkeeper has to be ready for the return to attempt a runout. In the case of a fielder, they may not have to do anything if the ball is hit to a position where they neither have to field or protect a fielding return.

There is no respite if it is a fast bowler or a spinner. In both cases, the wicketkeeper has to keep dancing behind the stumps as swing and spin take effect. Keeping behind a talented spinner is extremely tricky as there is a danger of conceding byes. The keeper also has to understand where the batsman is standing so that they can take advantage of a stumping opportunity.

Finally, when the wicketkeeper comes to bat, they usually come when already 4-6 wickets have fallen, and they have to play with the last recognized batsman or, worse, the tailenders. If the team is not doing well, the wicketkeeper is always under pressure to put up a reasonable score when the main batsmen have already failed. The batting superstar wicketkeepers like Gilchrist and Dhoni have been generally the exception, not the rule.

Finally, when was the last time that a wicketkeeper was the Man of the Match for his wicketkeeping alone?

The Potpourri of Cricket Matches

crowded-cricket-field

Among games that command international popularity, cricket should probably be the only one that has an assortment of different kinds of matches. We have Test matches that run for five days and do not sometimes even produce a result. That itself is unique among all sports. Then we have ODI’s (one day internationals) that last an entire day. Now, we also have Twenty20 matches that get over in an evening. 

This would be okay if the rules were the same for each of them. But that is not the case. Test cricket is still played in white clothing and red balls and has to be abandoned if there is bad light. ODI’s have free hits, Powerplays and Duckworth-Lewis. T20 matches have tie deciders with super overs. 

Nowadays, we have specialists in each type of match. There are some players who only play in the Test team and others only in ODI’s or T20′s, and they are unable to transfer their batting or bowling skills to the other match. Michael Bevan is a good example of that. Nowadays, players like Jayasuriya retire from one form of the sport or are sidelined by their Board to preserve their capability in the other forms. We also have different captains in each form. So far, this has not created a big issue because the captain in one of the formats does not find his place in the other format.

Bi-lateral series are increasingly having all three types of matches. ODI’s are still more common than Tests and T20′s simply because they offer more commercialization opportunities (i.e., make more money). In the long-term, they are likely to decrease as audiences for 50-over-apiece matches decline because of lower entertainment value and higher time requirements. Unless, of course, cricket boards find a way to monetize information flow to mobile phones and computers.

This decade of cricket has been the most innovative yet, beating any other sport in trying out new ideas and technologies. And it is not over yet. With the influx of large sums of money, the game is likely to change significantly as cricket spreads across the globe. 

[Photo licensed from sowri]

How Watching Live Cricket Ruined the Thriller

I watched the live telecast of the recent India vs Sri Lanka T20 game last Tuesday on Neo Cricket Live TV Channel. At this moment, I am on vacation in India after a gap of three years and was excited thinking I would enjoy my cricket moments while watching games with family and friends in India. The stage for the game was set. The toss was done. The Sri Lankan openers about to face the first delivery. Suddenly a harsh dose of reality bit me, as I saw how television marketing has made a significant intrusion into cricket games.

Television marketing, especially during cricket games, has skyrocketed in India. Before each and every delivery, there was this horribly annoying sidebar ad. I never got to see any action replay when a wicket fell, let alone if nothing special happened when the ball was bowled. There was not even a single micro-second (correct that, a nano-second) left to view the joy of the players or understand or assimilate any key on-field moments happening during the game. Like a hungry dog begging for morsels, I stayed glued to the TV, watching ads the entire game, waiting for a piece of cricket bone to be thrown at me, courtesy the sponsors.

I was told that Neo Cricket is a paid TV channel. For those folks who understand what a “paid” TV channel means, let me explain the paid TV service I am used to. You pay a premium price so that you get the maximum action and entertainment with few commercial interruptions, so that the viewer is exhilarated by the live action on the show and does not feel that he has to compromise by not being there in person.

When living in the US, I continue to get my regular toast of live cricket action and commentary through the paid Pay-Per-View cricket video delivered through satellite TV or web streaming sites. These are the broadcasts of the same Indian TV channels, but without commercial interruption. I heard about the recent satellite TV market entry into Indian households and I am extremely curious to know if they have any pay-per-view service on any Indian TV channels that has zero or few commercial interruptions.

In the end, what to say! While the Indian team scripted one of its most famous victorious chases in recent times, the audience (including me) were robbed, the moment stolen and destroyed by the media who have no concern for the cricket-loving populace of India.

Mahela Jayawardene’s Resignation

While Sri Lanka deserve criticism for their poor performance against India at home and their recent lacklustre performances in Bangladesh, this was perhaps the wrong time for Mahela to resign. And he did it in the worst way possible, saying that he would stay on until after the tour to Pakistan. This will reduce his effectiveness on the Pakistan tour, while putting pressure on Sangakkara to be in good form to inherit the captaincy.

Sri Lanka’s bad record has little to do with their captaincy. They stem from batsmen and bowlers who don’t contribute enough. Most of their contributions come from a few players – Jayawardene, Sangakkara, Jayasuriya, Murali and Mendis. If their spinners fail to click (as what happened against India), their bowling is entirely bereft of any edge. They also have been lulled into complacency by playing and winning too many matches against the weaker cricket teams (WI, NZ, Zimbabwe, Bangladesh) that they tolerate mediocre players for too long.

Since this is the second ODI series at home that Sri Lanka has lost against serious opposition, it is important to make a big cry over it. But it is idiotic to sacrifice the captain as the scapegoat. Maybe they should have dropped some of the senior players for 2-3 series and allow the others to play a relatively risk-free Pakistan series. Jayawardene has been doing well in the Test arena. It would have a matter of time before he bounced back in ODI’s too.

Now what for Sri Lanka? The Pakistan series now has higher stakes for the entire team. With Jayawardene leaving the limelight, the entire team will be under pressure to deliver. Hopefully, the SL Board will give a fresh slate of team members for the Pakistan tour, thus reducing that pressure and providing some opportunities for youngsters. Unfortunately, the tour seems to be too short with 3 ODI’s and 2 Tests. If Sri Lanka have an initial setback, they may not have enough time to recover. The entire team will be in disarray and a new captain taking over.

Ideally, if a captain wants to own responsibility for a loss, they should quit immediately after a series and let the new captain take over. To do that, they should have groomed the senior members in the team to take over as captain at anytime. It is very difficult to understand why Jayawardene wants to stay on as captain for the next tour, unless he thinks he can quit on a high. He could be in for an unpleasant surprise with the unpredictable Pakistani team.

Why England Lost

Let us take a look at the batting statistics of the England and West Indian teams again, this time comparing it to the averages in the match.

Strauss      42.37    8.00   -34.37
Cook         42.70    2.00   -40.70
Bell         41.48   16.00   -25.48
Pietersen    50.48   49.00    -1.48
Collingwood  42.04    8.50   -33.54
Flintoff     32.23   33.50     1.27
Prior        40.62   32.00    -8.62
Broad        33.90    2.00   -31.90
Sidebottom   15.64   32.00    16.36
Harmison     11.63    3.50    -8.13
Panesar       5.50    0.00    -5.50

Gayle        39.60  104.00    64.40
Smith        24.30    6.00   -18.30
Sarwan       39.58  107.00    67.42
Chanderpaul  49.71   20.00   -29.71
Marshall     22.09    0.00   -22.09
Nash         54.00   55.00     1.00
Ramdin       20.60   35.00    15.60
Taylor       16.66    8.00    -8.66
Benn         11.00   23.00    12.00
Powell        7.10    9.00     2.10
Edwards       4.45       -        -

The English batsmen (except for Flintoff, Sidebottom and Pietersen) came nowhere close to their average Test performances. In contrast, the majority of the West Indian team played greater than their potential. Right at the top, we can see the difference, the Top 3 of the English order scored 26 runs in 6 innings between them. The West Indian Top 3 scored 217 runs.

If we look at just the first innings, the difference is not huge. England would have accepted a 74-run first innings deficit, chalking it up to a below-par batting performance from them in the 1st innings and a few tenacious innings from the West Indians. What blew them away was the fiery 5-wicket haul by Taylor. Seldom has the flow of a match been totally changed within a few overs.

The English bowling was not terrible – Broad took a fiver, Harmison and Flintoff with 2 wickets each and Panesar & Sidebottom bowled tightly with little reward. In the West Indian team, only two bowlers really performed. But what a performance: 8 wickets each for Taylor and Benn at 10.62 and 13.50 respectively. They came into the match with unintimidating averages of 59 and 35 respectively and changed the complexion of the game.

The real battle of the match was fought and won in just 155 minutes and 200 balls (33.2 overs). Now how will England respond, especially if Chanderpaul, who missed out on this match, decides to join the party? Can the West Indies repeat their bowling performance in the next match?

The Aging Warriors in the Sri Lankan Team

Sanath Jayasuriya and Muttiah Muralitharan are the most senior members of the Sri Lankan team. They were part of the Ranatunga outfit that took the Sri Lankans from minnow status to one of the powerhouses in international cricket. But they are aging fast at 39 and 36 years respectively, and it needs to be seen how Sri Lanka will handle their retirements.

Murali has already decided to make the 2011 World Cup his final goobye. Since it will be played in the Indian sub-continent, it would be a good place for him to go out with a bang. Having now claimed the highest number of wickets in one-dayers and Tests, there are few records left for him to break.

I guess he could continue playing if he is still in good health, but the problem is that everytime he has a slump in form, people will take it as a sign of decline with age, and he will be under pressure. Sri Lanka does not have the strength to accomplish any great feats in Test cricket that would necessitate Murali hanging around.

Sri Lanka, being much stronger in ODIs than Tests, it is possible that Murali will go Jayasuriya’s route of a Test retirement first. With Mendis around, it won’t be as easy to grab the lion’s share of wickets any longer, and so the pace of wicket-taking will fall. In addition, longer tours against the bigger Test nations will prove gruelling.

Jayasuriya is also likely to try to stick around for the 2011 World Cup finals, but he has not made any commitment or expressed interest. AFAIK, he is taking it one match at a time. Sri Lanka has few talented and destructive batsmen as him. So his place is safe for the time being.

Since he retired from Tests, Jayasuriya only has limited overs achievements ahead of him. As far as individual records go, he is way behind Sachin Tendulkar, so perhaps the 2011 World Cup is the only thing left for him. Sri Lanka do have a good chance at it (if they can reverse the current slump), but South Africa and India could crash that party.

England Humiliated

The problems of Australia and Sri Lanka seem trivial when compared to what transpired with England today. When West Indies were out for 392 on the 4th morning of the Test, hardly anyone in the world would have imagined that the game would be over in less than three hours, with England bowled out for their third lowest score in a Test innings.

Until England’s innings, there was not much to choose between the two teams. Obviously, England had under-performed against their potential, allowing the West Indies to grab a 76-run lead, but the major damage was caused by the two WI centurians, Gayle and Sarwan. But there are no excuses to the events that happened after that. Taylor bowled the spell of his lifetime. And surprise, surprise! They got there without a significant contribution from Chanderpaul.

This is an incredible mess for England. After the public linen-washing in the Pietersen-Moores flap, the ECB and Strauss, the new captain, would have hoped to turn over a new leaf against an opponent, currently the weakest of the Test-playing nations bar Bangladesh. That was not to be. It will take enormous mental strength from the team to overcome this setback. Echoes of the Adelaide debacle come to mind. Will a demoralized England be even competitive in the remaining Tests? This is going to be the biggest challenge for Strauss.

As for our prediction about the match winner, we seem to have egg on our face, probably a few rotten vegetables too! But models are there to be improved using results. And so, we will come up with an improved model for the upcoming matches.