Launching Cricket Question & Answer Site

We just started a new cricket question and answer site at http://cricket.kridaya.com. Unlike a blog, this allows you  to participate as a full member of the site asking questions and providing answers to others. You will gain votes and badges for activities including voting, tagging and so on. As you gain badges, your reputation will grow and you will get more rights such as the ability to edit answers and moderate the site.

Go crazy at http://cricket.kridaya.com. You can login using your Gmail or Yahoo! account.

Kridaya Cricket Q &A

Cricket in Baseball Terminology

An interesting article by Minnesota Public Radio explaining cricket in baseball terminology:

Each play begins with a pitch to a batter. The batter tries to hit the ball and then run to a base. The fielders record outs by catching the ball on the fly or by throwing the ball to the base before a runner gets there. Teams score runs by advancing on the bases, and the team that scores the most runs wins the game.

There are quite a lot of articles about how cricket is gaining popularity in the United States because of greater immigration. The same is said of soccer. I feel that it would happen only if  the children of the immigrants start playing cricket or soccer in large numbers.

I am more optimistic about soccer because, when compared to cricket, it has greater infrastructure in the US. Also soccer has several grassroots advantages over cricket: easier rules, fewer equipment, smaller playing area, less danger, etc. Formal cricket is, of course, costlier and more difficult to organize than soccer.

This is not a reflection on which sport is better, just how easier it is for soccer to spread when compared to cricket. Of course, the reverse has been true in India, but I would attribute this to televised games and India’s 1983 World Cup win. If the Indian soccer team had greater success, perhaps there could have been a different story.

President Barack Obama and Cricket

In an interview with Anwar Iqbal:

‘You cannot escape cricket while living with Pakistanis. Did they leave a cricket bat with you?’
‘You know, I have to say that I have tried to get up to bat a couple of times, but I’ve been terrible. So I’m an admirer of great cricket players, but make no claims in terms of my own skills,’ said Mr Obama, breaking into a broad smile.

‘You cannot escape cricket while living with Pakistanis. Did they leave a cricket bat with you?’

‘You know, I have to say that I have tried to get up to bat a couple of times, but I’ve been terrible. So I’m an admirer of great cricket players, but make no claims in terms of my own skills,’ said Mr Obama, breaking into a broad smile.

Obama is probably talking about the time he shared some batting tips with Brian Lara. From a political standpoint, Obama would be well-served to associate himself with soccer (sorry, football!) and cricket when he gets the opportunity. And on that score, it seems that he has accepted an invitation to the 2010 FIFA World Cup in South Africa.

BTW, what’s up with South Africa hosting all the big tournaments nowadays, including the Indian Premier League? Will the Olympics be next?

The Future of Afghanistan: Cricket

Kabul during the Afghan War

Via CorSullivan, we have the incredible tale of the Afghan cricket team which may qualify for the 2011 World Cup:

When the British marched into Afghanistan in 1838, they brought polo mallets, fox hounds and cigars. They brought imperial hubris, bone china and cases of port. But the players of the Great Game also brought a great game: cricket.

One hundred and seventy-one years later, cricket has returned here, an outpost of the world’s most civilised sport in one of the world’s most brutal places. Today, the Afghan national cricket team opens its 2009 campaign to secure a place at the Cricket World Cup in 2011, having already won two qualifying tournaments last year. That this stricken, blood-soaked country should be able to field a cricket team at all, let alone one as successful as this, is an astonishing achievement: it is a story of endurance and passion, and of the strange power of sport to transcend politics and war. [...]

If Afghanistan is a nation full of despair, its cricket team is a rare beacon of hope. The players will tell you that they feel their country has been let down on so many levels by the international community. On that green stretch of grass in Argentina today, at least, it’s Afghanistan’s chance to nudge the balance sheet. Pride is the word that the countless fans and well-wishers have used, again and again, in postings on the team’s Facebook page. Says one supporter, Ahmad: “Loins of Afghanistan, proud of you all… I have a wish, that is to show the world that we can beat you.” Or, in the words of the captain, Nowroz Mangal, “Cricket is not just a sport. It is much, much more.”

[Read the entire post]

Adnan Khan, writing on Macleans, says:

A decade ago, if anyone even mentioned Afghan cricket, they would have been the laughingstock of the cricketing community. “Afghans play buzkashi,” cricket snobs around the world might have said derisively, referring to Afghanistan’s national sport in which men on horseback battle to carry a goat carcass over an opposing team’s goal line. “Cricket is too refined a game for them.” What most people didn’t realize at the time was that Afghan refugees living in the impoverished camps of Peshawar on the Pakistani frontier were developing a love for Pakistan’s own national pastime.

Across the border in Afghanistan, the Taliban regime had banned cricket along with any other sport, including buzkashi. Only in Pakistan could Afghan cricketers express their desire to learn the game, as well as showcase their talent for it. Now, since the fall of the Taliban regime in 2001, Afghan cricketers have risen to the rank of golden boys in the cricketing world, turning heads from Malaysia to Tanzania. Their most recent triumph at the 2009 Division 3 World Cup qualifying tournament in Buenos Aires has propelled them up the world rankings to a level nearly on par with Canada’s own national team.

In the last few years, the Iraq War has grabbed all our attention. But once in a while, articles like these bring back us to what is happening in this landlocked country that has been plagued by violence in the past three decades.  The Afghans are a proud nation, but they remain divided. The influence of a national sport like cricket can help unite them in the way that the 3Cs – Cinema (Bollywood), Cricket and Congress (the Indian National Congress) helped unite the fledgling India after independence.

Qualifying for the World Cup and having their team have an extended run by beating a few giants can improve the country more than the entire NATO force. The armed forces should flood the country with TV’s that can access free satellite coverage of the cricket World Cup. Our best wishes are with these brave players from a land that is struggling to find its identity.

Village Cricket Tips

village-cricket

Sports Dictionary has some good tips on how to captain your village (or town) cricket team:

  1. Make sure you have 11 players on the field at the start of play!
  2. Give priority in selection to those who come to nets and turn up religiously to matches.
  3. Know what you’ll do if you win the toss.
  4. Attack in the field.
  5. Have a team plan when batting

[And more...]

Bowling tends to get neglected in village cricket as everyone wants to be a big hitter and gain glory. But if you have at least 3 good bowlers who can contain and take wickets, you have more options to play with. You can successfully defend low scores and thus there is less pressure on your batsmen.

Although your “little league” matches don’t have international grade players, your opponents are at the same level too. Use all the strategies and tactics you can get your hands on. And keep practising as much as you can. Watching more cricket wouldn’t hurt as long as you watch the batting and bowling of the better team.


[Also read some of our other posts on unofficial cricket: Street cricket, Book cricket, French cricket, Tennis ball cricket]

[Photo licensed from Steve Parker]

Cricket Team Colors

For a long time, cricketers only had white to wear: white trousers, white shirts, white shoes, white pads, and even white sweaters, for crying out loud. With the advent of one-day matches, this started to change. Now, you can recognize your favorite cricket team by what they wear, even if you don’t recognize the players.

Here are the colors for each team:

india1 India
They had a sky blue dress. The Board just changed it to darker shade of blue, still light, but not so much.
australia Australia
Yellow with some green markings. The Australian Baggy Green is a tradition in its own right.
south-africa South Africa   

Opposite of the Australia to some degree: Mainly green with some yellow stripes.

england England   

Regular Blue with Red

pakistan Pakistan   

Green everywhere. Dominated by the lighter green with the darker variety appearing to the sides

Sri Lanka India Cricket Muralitharan Sri Lanka   

A really dark blue. Not much else. 

west-indies-cricket West Indies   

Maroon red. Good thing they don’t wear those in Test matches.

new-zealand New Zealand   

Take one guess about what you expect from the Black Caps.

Bangladesh Bangladesh   

Dark green with red stripes.

 


[Images may be subject to copyright. Each image is linked to its respective source ]

England Team Keeps Fans Confused

antigua

England have bounced back from their spectacular low of 51 all out in the first Test against the West Indies with a monumental total of 566. With almost all the England players cashing in with 2 centuries and 3 fifties, this was a team effort and everyone deserves credit from being able to exorcise the ghosts of the Sabina Park debacle.

When a team makes a score ten times higher than their previous outing, we have to look closely at their patterns of performance. So, we took a look at the recent performances of England and compared it with the West Indies. To no one’s surprise, England is much stronger on its batting performances than the West Indies. The English team has an average of 36 runs per wicket in its last 13 Test matches (including the Jamaica Test), while the West Indies have an average of 31.68 per wicket. That is almost 43 runs per innings.

However, England’s scores have a standard deviation of 18 runs per innings, which means that they are as likely to score 180 as they are to score 540. WI have a standard deviation of 11 runs, which means their capability is more between 200 and 420. Obviously, teams change in composition (with players retiring or dropped) and they play against different countries, but it is still very striking. The West Indians, while performing poorly, are performing consistently. England, on the other hand, can put up huge scores, but are also prone to collective failures.

Even without the help of statistics, we see England running the gamut from an imperious 593/8 declared against an opponent no less than the South Africans, but also slumping to 110 all out against the Kiwis. The lowest score for West Indies was 139 and their highest score was 408, significantly lower than what England could achieve as a team. In fact, if they overhaul England’s first innings in the current Test, that would be a statistical outlier, almost 50% more than their high score in more than a year.

England should not have to bat again in this match, but the West Indians are pretty good at sticking around. And if the weather plays a part, they may still escape unscathed.

[Photo licensed from z_dead]

The Multiple Indian Squads for New Zealand

dravid

Here are the Indian squads for the New Zealand tour, by Tests, ODIs and T20′s:

                       Tests    ODIs     T20s
MS Dhoni                 Yes     Yes      Yes
Yuvraj Singh             Yes     Yes      Yes
Gautam Gambhir           Yes     Yes      Yes
Harbhajan Singh          Yes     Yes      Yes
Dinesh Karthik           Yes     Yes      Yes
Zaheer Khan              Yes     Yes      Yes
Munaf Patel              Yes     Yes      Yes
Virender Sehwag          Yes     Yes      Yes
Ishant Sharma            Yes     Yes      Yes
Sachin Tendulkar         Yes     Yes        -
L Balaji                 Yes       -        -
Rahul Dravid             Yes       -        -
Dhawal Kulkarni          Yes       -        -
VVS Laxman               Yes       -        -
Amit Mishra              Yes       -        -
M Vijay                  Yes       -        -
Praveen Kumar              -     Yes      Yes
Pragyan Ojha               -     Yes      Yes
Irfan Pathan               -     Yes      Yes
Yusuf Pathan               -     Yes      Yes
Suresh Raina               -     Yes      Yes
Rohit Sharma               -     Yes      Yes
Ravindra Jadeja            -       -      Yes

Nothing can state more clearly how cricket has changed than the composition of the squads. For a tour lasting just over a month, only 9 players out of 23 have been selected for all three forms of the game. Six of the Test players (including Dravid and Laxman) find themselves only in the Test team. At the other end of the spectrum, Ravindra Jadeja has been selected to play just the two T20′s, which combined make up less than a day of Test play.

Dhoni is the captain for all the three formats, and perhaps will be the wicketkeeper too for the most part. It is a miracle that he does not fall apart under the pressures of the captaincy and the wicketkeeper jobs. Other teams have experimented with different captains in different formats, but it has not caught on as much as it should have.

In general, this is a good trend. It provides more opportunities for youngsters to prove themselves as well as provide the right role for players. For example, some players may only excel in the limited overs format and they may have to kept there for ever. Sachin Tendulkar, for one, has recognized this, at least in the T20 arena.

[Photo licensed from vighi]

The Wicketkeeper

Philadelphian cricket team wicket keeper Henry Scattergood

Being the wicketkeeper is the hardest job in the cricket team. Every other player is judged on what they did, such as the number of runs scored or the wickets taken. But the wicketkeeper is judged on what they didn’t do. If they fail to take a catch or miss a stumping, that will be the defining moment of their match. Everybody expects the wicketkeeper to take catches, and they don’t forget the ones he missed. The extras column in a scorecard silently records the miscues of the wicketkeeper through byes and leg-byes.

The wicketkeeper is also forced to wear heavy protection throughout the innings – pads, gloves and helmet. They sometimes have to field leg-byes running in the heavy accessories. When the weather is warm, this can be very tiring. Wicketkeepers seldom get substitutes, unless they are injured, because of the inconvenience in decking someone up for the role.

In street cricket, players frequently want to keep wickets because they think it is less work than fielding. But in fact, wicketkeeping is the most tiring task of all the fielders. Because of the nature of the game (fewer fielders with no long stop, amateurish keeping), the wicketkeeper has to keep chasing a lot more balls than they initially planned to.

The wicketkeeper cannot relax at any time. They have to keep watching every ball from its delivey by the bowler to when it becomes dead. For example, the batsmen may take a run, and the wicketkeeper has to be ready for the return to attempt a runout. In the case of a fielder, they may not have to do anything if the ball is hit to a position where they neither have to field or protect a fielding return.

There is no respite if it is a fast bowler or a spinner. In both cases, the wicketkeeper has to keep dancing behind the stumps as swing and spin take effect. Keeping behind a talented spinner is extremely tricky as there is a danger of conceding byes. The keeper also has to understand where the batsman is standing so that they can take advantage of a stumping opportunity.

Finally, when the wicketkeeper comes to bat, they usually come when already 4-6 wickets have fallen, and they have to play with the last recognized batsman or, worse, the tailenders. If the team is not doing well, the wicketkeeper is always under pressure to put up a reasonable score when the main batsmen have already failed. The batting superstar wicketkeepers like Gilchrist and Dhoni have been generally the exception, not the rule.

Finally, when was the last time that a wicketkeeper was the Man of the Match for his wicketkeeping alone?