This World Cup has been better than the last, but the entire credit should go to Group B. If you consider close matches and upsets, there were only 2 matches out of 21 in Group A when compared to 9 in Group B. Adding around 3 matches in either group which promised to be interesting (such as the Pakistan v Canada match) until one team finally won comfortably, about half the matches in Group B were interesting while that goes down to once every 5 matches in Group A. We had to wait till the penultimate match in Group B to know the quarter-finalists where as in Group A, that was known with 4 matches left to play.
The twist is that Group A ended up with the teams ranked out of order to their strength on paper (Australia ending up 3rd and Canada above Kenya). And Group B almost exactly to what you might have predicted before the tournament. (you can quibble where SA or India is better).
To see how different the two groups played, here are a couple of illustrations on how close the matches were (Green = close/upset, Blue = promising, Red = walkover). Thank God for England!
| Group A | Group B |
|---|---|
|
|

